The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal from a teacher who was fired by the New York City public schools after it came to light that he was a leader in a group advocating for the legalization of sex between adult men and underage boys. Peter Melzer, who had been teaching at one of the city’s prestigious academic high schools for thirty years, had his dismissal upheld by a federal appeals court last summer. Claiming that his firing violated his constitutional rights to freedom of speech and association, Melzer sought review from the Supreme Court. However, without providing any comment, the justices declined to do so on February 23.

In a telephone interview, Mr. Melzer expressed his deep disappointment with the court’s decision. He firmly stated that he had always behaved in an exemplary manner and that the situation was merely a matter of free speech. He bitterly recounted how his career of three decades came to an end in such a manner. On the other hand, a lawyer representing the city expressed their satisfaction with the Supreme Court’s action in the case. They believed that the 2nd Circuit had made the correct decision, as did the city attorney who had handled the case.

While Peter Melzer openly admitted his sexual attraction to young adolescent boys, he had not been accused of engaging in any sexual misconduct with students in the district. However, his involvement in the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) raised concerns among district officials. NAMBLA’s objective, as stated on its website, is to eliminate the oppression faced by men and boys involved in consensual relationships.

The district officials argued that Mr. Melzer’s activities had compromised his effectiveness as a teacher and disrupted operations at the Bronx High School of Science, where he had taught physics since 1962. Media reports in 1993 had revealed his leadership position in NAMBLA, resulting in protests by numerous parents and students. The court papers revealed that investigators handling the case were alarmed by articles that provided advice regarding avoiding arrest for engaging in sexual relationships with underage boys or possessing child pornography.

In a unanimous decision, the 2nd Circuit court ruled last July that Mr. Melzer’s freedom of speech and association were indeed protected by the First Amendment. However, the court deemed that the district’s interest in effectively fulfilling its public duties outweighed these rights. The panel highlighted that teaching requires a high level of public trust, especially when one is acting as "in loco parentis" for a group of students that includes adolescent boys. The court acknowledged that the public cannot suppress unpopular ideas that provoke anger. Nonetheless, it deemed parental objections to keeping Mr. Melzer in the classroom to be reasonable and a valid consideration for his termination. Eugene B. Nathanson, Mr. Melzer’s lawyer, expressed his regret over the final outcome of the case. He believed that this case, along with the broader trend of First Amendment employee litigation, poses a significant threat to employees’ free speech rights.

Mr. Melzer, who is now 65 years old, drew comparisons between his treatment and past advocates for the abolition of slavery, voting rights for women, interracial marriage, and birth control. He argued that while society may ultimately not accept the causes certain groups fight for, the Constitution is meant to safeguard unpopular speech.

emmawillis

Emma Willis is a 31-year-old blogger and professor. She has a passion for writing and teaching, and loves exploring new ideas and sharing her insights with others. Emma is a natural leader and motivator, and has a gift for helping people discover their own potential. She is also an avid learner, always looking for new ways to improve her skills and knowledge.